- 18.0-megapixel CMOS Sensor and Dual DIGIC 4 Image Processors for high image quality and speed
- Body only; lenses sold separately
- Advanced HD movie mode with manual exposure control and selectable frame rates
- Intelligent Viewfinder with 100 percent field of view; 19-point, all cross-type AF system equipped with dual diagonal cross-type sensors
- Capture images to CF Card Type I and II, UDMA-compliant CF cards (not included)
Product Features DescriptionWith many times to improve the half of the entire photographic process, photos and video, the EOS 7D represents a whole new category of camera. Fact is a selection tool for serious photographers and semi-professionals, the EOS 7D has 18 0-megapixel CMOS APS-C size sensor and two DIGIC 4 image processor, capturing great pictures up to ISO 12,800 and up to 8 frames per second. EOS 7D is a different kind of 19-point AF system improves the AI Servo AF subject tracking and user-selectable AF area selection mode for sharp focus, regardless of the situation. I'm looking for intelligent EOS 7D offers a 100% coverage, and displays a user selected AF mode and spot metering circle, and the grid demand. iFCL measure 63-in dual-measurement system used for both the level of attention and color information to provide accurate exposure in difficult lighting conditions. EOS 7D also save a Full HD video to 30p, 24p and 25p with a variety of manual controls such as exposure during the filming of movies and the selection of ISO sensitivity. EOS 7D properties of magnesium alloy body that is dust and weather-resistant durability and laying up to 150,000 cycles.
Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD 
Ordered on Amazon. Lens is used Canon EF 24-105mm f / 4 L. Compared to my Canon 40D, 7D is a new 19-point AF system, but not toimi.Useimmat all my photos are not as strong as my 40D, if not focus on any AF mode or micro-säätö.Kuvat is vague and has no consistent policy could be combined with the posterior typical / asiaan.Useimmat fire in front of the AF system reviews heaped praise again, maybe it was already in production (bad) yksikkö.Ei update for the 40D, if the images are not sharp . I can not try to change or wait for Canon to update the firmware to work on asioita.Tein. The video quality seems on par with other Canon HD video.Kaiken all, I am disappointed with the 7D, because the expectations were very korkeat.10-30-09 – Back to Amazon. Waiting for the new body.
Rating: 1 / 5
I paid more than $ 1800, and life and the RAW file takes 25M bytes, which is more than two times higher than the previous camera. So I guess the image quality is good. Yes, the picture quality is really good, only if the size of a RAW file is something 25Mbytes to 1024 pixels wide, ISO 400 and above. Buy a good point and shoot camera, and is the picture quality is incredible, and when a small ISO have enough light. We will have to pay more and use more memory (and pay for this) to get the ISO down most DSLR when there is not enough light. If you are willing to the size of 1024 pixels wide is not a problem at high ISO – but because you want to spend 25Mbytes first? And why do you want to pay $ 1800 and the body? I took about 40 pictures for the collection. It was evening and the light was more than enough to read books very well. Thus, at least not enough light to create images of poor quality. Anyway, I use high ISO (1600 and 3200) so that I have blurred images. Also, I read so much praise from 7p fanatics sensitivity 7D ISO was as good. Somehow, I trusted them. But I was very surprised that so many white dots / pixel is a dark area when viewed 100% since I showed my picture was uploaded. In reality, there is no problem if the down-sample (size) 1024-pixel width. You can not see the niitä.Kysyin resolve this problem, and there were two answers. One is that it is perfectly normal and 7D, which is the number of pixels of a sensor of small size. And I have to remap the white pixels with the software. Self Lightroom will do it automatically. But not DPP (Canon RAW software). And Lightroom is now ready for 7D. Another answer is that the 7D is so good and high ISO, and I got a lemon. I hesitated what to do. And I decided to come back and try another 7D, only a finding that this was a disaster. New shows exactly the same problem. In addition, a new hot pixels that are reflected in ISO100. In fact, there are five dead pixels. I know that this is OK, only if they are scattered around. Unfortunately, all these five adjacent pixels together, and the white area is dead on the spot clearly visible in every kuvassa.Joten not know now what to do. I will definitely return to this 7D, which is a dead pixel. But unfortunately I can not change. I just might switch to another 7D and live as white dots high ISO, and to be satisfied with the arrangements laid down sample'ed images? Or should I switch to other Canon camera, or Nikon. . . In any case, I think, the camera does not consider this a waste of expensive and 25Mbytes of raw files just to create these images hurt in mid-high ISO. And my horrible experience, I can only give one star. But YMMV .- edit — OK, I am determined to get a replacement 7D – this is the 3rd one. This time, I was tired. "What is, I just wanted to do it. I live in white dots and a few dead pixels or something like that. Hopefully, it's my destiny. . . So, I do not go through the test medium and high ISO, and I do not know what it would be this time – and I worry more. But then when I took the picture, I noticed that they were so soft. I looked and saw that the 7D is not to focus properly. AF lenses are needed for micro-changes. At least two previous 7DS AF does not have this problem and do not need microadjustments AF, as stated in the manual. They have been the focus correctly. From 3 7D is not, I went through the micro-changes in AF. However, I also discovered that the distance microadjustment AF specific and not a global one aperture lens adjustment. For example, if properly microadjustment and F2. 8 1 foot (was 15), AF is the F-5. 6 7-foot was very vague. So I microadjustment by the setting of AF, and the value was – 20, but the images are blurry and F2. 8 1 foot away. I tried to find a Middle-worth, which works in all cases, but when I found the AF miroadjustment certain distance and openness, has no other open and distance. So there is a global lens. It varies according to distance and aperture setting of the single lens. What Bummer. . . I think a lot of people who complain about problems 7D AF are 7DS any I have now. But if you take the image at F8. 0 or more, AF is looking OK – not because 7D works fine, but since this gap is syvemmällä.Niin depth of field, all the people who praise the Cannon 7D and there are people who are very lucky, or if you only care about / Don 't know yksityiskohtia.Ja am very unlucky person. . .
Rating: 1 / 5
I only had the camera 3 days, so I can not comment on anything, but this thing: the smell autofocus. They are quite often a lot of problems outdoors under the sun, rather than requiring AF 10sec or more of each other, and even some "red" indicators (AF is the other). Well, is not why so much money spent for this Hulk. Save yourself grief, wait until you get AF working before you buy.
Rating: 3 / 5
Hello everyone, I pre-ordered this camera a couple of weeks ago, they need to return to the position of the scheduled date. Then I checked today and it says huomenna.He estimated delivery time from Amazon has started selling an alternative supplier, $ 200 more than the SRP. I thought it a bit 'odd seeing as I had received notification of shipment, and were already selling varajärjestelmää.Otin contacted Amazon customer service immediately, and said: "They had not respected the Amazon seller again, and not had the opportunity to improve the availability of the item page. "It would have been nice if they would have drawn attention to this fact" small "instead of BSing me, so you can maintain a high lipunmyynti.Tee themselves a favor if you live in NY state in addition to the end, Well H-image. Or sales tax, are very customer service, and reasonable prices. (In this case: MSRP. Imagine.) Amazon I always use, and rarely a problem, but this is rather a mistake. If I had not studied the case, it would have cost my company thousands of dollars in lost revenue, because I had this camera today. I thought that others may find this information apua.I rated 5 stars, whose goal is to occur in the future because I have no doubts about its performance against the price this camera is. Prosumer gives a whole new meaning. I will update again in a few weeks if I'm kaikille._Brad care väärässä.Take
Rating: 5 / 5
I was going to buy a 7D as I did in general comparison of all Canon cameras up to the latest models, and here's what I found. . . Unless you're going to make large prints (over 11×14), then the extra resolution is not väliä.Mitä I expected, although it was as close to the 20D yet these kamerat.Ainoa that was really out , interestingly, was the original 5D. 5D is the camera Canon has done so far sharper. (The original 5D looks better than anything Canon has so far.) Bottom line, when it comes to pure picture quality, lens gives you much more 20D ero.Käytetään same objective can be considered almost the same as a 7D treatment shortly after. What can I get with the purchase of 7D. . 1. Bigger is better LCD näyttö.2. Automaattitarkennus.3 better. Video. The picture quality is now a task of taking a good image to boot, and then the transformation in a way appropriate to the camera itself. Canon was able to make significant improvements 20Dtältä away again. . . If you are really serious about taking great photos to get used 20D and 40D and the lens is good and then concentrate on taking pictures and all this technical BS;) PS This review is based on the 7D, and a friend, as you can see I give it 5 stars. There are two types of photographers have come to find. That focus on the means and the focus on results. I use one of the first. . . It is much easier to buy expensive equipment you really learn to use it. This camera is a camera for more than 90% of people have never, myself included. But hey, if you have money. . . Knock yourself out. But also to obtain good glass, I can highly recommend the F2 17-55. 8 lenses.
Rating: 5 / 5